Yes, that is quite an unusual topic and it has some interesting connections. Please allow me to explain.
I had the pleasure to discuss Middle East issues in a candid meeting with General James Mattis, Commander of the U.S. Central Command. Gen. Mattis took responsibility for this crucial assignment from General David Petraeus in August 2010.
After hearing from the General, I applied some of his messaging to current situations in nations where service of process is challenging, at times, and extremely difficult on a regular basis. It should be pointed out that his focus was on military, political and economic topics and not on civil litigation issues.
Here is his summary of the current situation in specific countries along with my appraisal of the result upon cross-border civil litigation:
I had the pleasure to discuss Middle East issues in a candid meeting with General James Mattis, Commander of the U.S. Central Command. Gen. Mattis took responsibility for this crucial assignment from General David Petraeus in August 2010.
After hearing from the General, I applied some of his messaging to current situations in nations where service of process is challenging, at times, and extremely difficult on a regular basis. It should be pointed out that his focus was on military, political and economic topics and not on civil litigation issues.
Here is his summary of the current situation in specific countries along with my appraisal of the result upon cross-border civil litigation:
- Egypt: “The government is in disarray and could go either way.” If Sharia law is imposed, the legal system could be dramatically altered and cooperation between Egyptian courts and other signatories to the Hague Service Convention could be jeopardized.
- Syria: “If Assad goes, it will be the biggest hit to Iran.” With looming sanctions against Syria pending by Europe and the U.S., judicial cooperation in civil matters may be stalled.
- Iran: “Iran's fingerprints are everywhere. They now financially support states who they view as enemies against the West.” Service of process, in Iran, is not an authorized function by the government since they view foreign litigation as an infringement upon their sovereignty.
- Lebanon: “There are close ties to Iran.” Lebanon currently cooperates in civil legal matters from outside the country. However, that could change if Lebanon adopts a total conversion to Sharia law.
- Iraq: “If the military becomes Iranian-backed after our departure, that will create the most dangerous force.” Currently, service of process is handled by civilians without government participation. If the government falters after Allied troops leave, so will the ability to serve legal process
General Mattis made a formal presentation to the Los Angeles World Affairs Council in which he stated four major objectives in U.S. military policy in the region:
- Support each country’s reform efforts and allow them to move at their own pace;
- Support economic reform;
- Support renewed political peace;
- Support regulated security in combatting terrorism.
I was extremely impressed with General Mattis’ candor and his insight into the military, political and economic situations in each country in the Middle East. His expertise and insight have greatly benefited in the fight against terrorism.
Nelson Tucker is CEO of Process Service Network, LLC that specializes in international service of process. He can be contacted at processnet@sbcglobal.net or through the firm’s website at www.processnet1.com
It is very helpful in giving me that information
ReplyDeleteAnwen